Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry



[It has not escaped my attention that in just a few short weeks I will be expected to fulfill some sort of regular blogging commitment over at tor.com. Last I checked, um, eighty-seven weeks ago, I was an atrocious blogger. I talked about this with Brian Slattery over brunch before his panel at New York Comic Con, and our consensus was that we were both ill-suited for blogging because the journalistic urge is in some ways the antithesis of the editorial urge: while a good blogger must be generative in the face of time constraints and fallowness, an editor is charged with making sure a piece of writing has the exact ingredients it needs to make its case, excising pointless additives and making sure none of the essentials are left out. And it is on these exact standards that I flounder, far too paranoid that I will bore my audience or, worse yet, leave out the precise detail that would win you over to my side.

But this is a balance I will have to figure out, and I'd much rather do it here than there. I think the best way to train myself is to start off in a sprint, trying my damnedest to post one small thing every day. To stave off my descent into the tragic verbosity that is inevitably my downfall, I'm limiting myself to no more than three sentences a day. I am allowing em-dashes, semicolons, links, parentheticals, ellipses, and maybe some artful run-ons, so they may be
long sentences (I'm only human!). But I trust that you'll all chastise me appropriately if I stray from my basic goal?

Obviously, this bracketed section is included for administrative purposes only and does not count. Heh. Here we go for real:]


I remarked to [info]thumbelinablues this morning that last Wednesday's KGB felt like it was weeks ago, presumably due to the massive time distortion field generated by NYCC, at which, within the space of about twenty-four hours, I moderated my second comics panel; took an anthropological stroll with one of my favorite writers; gave out several gazillion buttons featuring our rocketship mascot Stubby; acquired several hopeless crushes; attended two panels; ate sushi with an elite cadre of illustrators; had conversations with dozens of creators and publishers who have naught to do with SF, networking wildly in support of my new comics acquisition gig; made myself go to the afterparty by myself and stay there until I'd had a conversation with a stranger; and finally started to feel like my comics cred is slightly less of a sham than I sometimes fear. I also reproduced the absurd trajectory that seems to be my standard MO at conventions dominated by rows of tables, spending the first two days thinking I have all the time in the world, then suddenly realizing that I've actually got two hours left and 80% of the floor to cover, and consequently seeing a depressingly small subsection of the exciting new things everyone had on hand: in fact, the only things I managed to buy were A Journey to the End of Taste (so far, it's like a direct transcription of my internal conflict with mainstream culture, except several times cleverer) and the first two issues of Comic Foundry—which were both, now that I think about it, directly or indirectly Douglas' fault. It was excellent and exhilarating and exhausting, and has invoked the standard post-con bittersweetness at having to go back to my regular life, which currently consists of grapes, carrots, and peanut butter for dinner and a forced march to stay in the office until I've finished just a few more things and set this entry free.

Comments

[info]neutronjockey wrote:
Apr. 22nd, 2008 11:32 am (UTC)
It appears to be Ms. Gorinsky, but as we all know Ms. Gorinsky doesn't blog.

Move along folks...there is nothing to see here... nothing to see...

[info]2muchexposition wrote:
Apr. 23rd, 2008 06:21 am (UTC)
If I had any idea that being incredibly flaky about something would get me off the hook for it this easily, I would have tried this strategy much earlier.
[info]signifier wrote:
Apr. 22nd, 2008 12:43 pm (UTC)
My apologies for leading you to the fleshpots of commerce. And by "apologies," I mean "gales of evil laughter."
[info]2muchexposition wrote:
Apr. 23rd, 2008 06:21 am (UTC)
Too true, though one of those purchases was significantly fleshpot-ier than the other. I shudder to think how this trend will develop when you realize what true evils you can use this influence for.
[info]gryphonrose wrote:
Apr. 22nd, 2008 01:26 pm (UTC)
Hey, nice to see you posting! Sorry I missed you at the con--I was only there Friday evening and Saturday afternoon, and when I stopped by Tor I only recognized Paul. Cool about the new gig (Hm, the freelancer side of me wonders if there will be submissions guidelines soon), glad you had a good con, and yes, it's always amazing those people who manage to blog every day. I usually only manage every other week or so myself--I keep meaning to blog more anecdotally but usually get too busy to bother. Sad.
[info]2muchexposition wrote:
Apr. 23rd, 2008 06:29 am (UTC)
No worries--I only had four hours of booth duty and didn't want to crowd the space when I wasn't working it, so I was mostly wandering. I doubt we'll be circing formal guidelines for the project because we'd prefer to have individual conversations with each creator, but if you have an idea for a short comics project, you can certainly e-mail me a paragraph or two about what you had in mind.
[info]readingthedark wrote:
Apr. 22nd, 2008 01:36 pm (UTC)
It's great to see a post from you and editors do focus on concision, exactitude and structure but you're smashing in non-editorial ways too. Feel free to blog about the other ways in which you are smashing.

And what is this "mainstream culture" you speak of?

I didn't realize that the mainstream had any culture at all.

Still rubbing my eyes to make sure that this post is real, I'd posit that there is great work and there are indicator species and that the two occasionally bend the mainstream in their direction. I guess it's easier to describe with music. There's always some band that doesn't sound like the mainstream at all but gets at least a moment of attention for being so spactacular that even the zombies wandering the box-shaped stores have to take notice.

To wreck my own point because it's more fun to crash and burn this than keep building the argument, I am 100% certain that there are many unopened copies of Garcia Marquez bought by people who love Oprah and many Gnarls Barkley albums that were listened to twice (except for "Crazy" which is still on repeat). Suffice it to say that plenty of creators have had culture moments without being mainstream.
[info]2muchexposition wrote:
Apr. 23rd, 2008 06:33 pm (UTC)
You are too kind, as always. I suspect that some of the strangers who have friended me really only want to hear about my job, but I guess they'll have to get used to sitting through some other stuff on the way. Lucky for them, I'm a bit of a workaholic.

I'm reflexively inclined to be dismissive of anything that's massively popular, but I've also always felt uncomfortably arrogant about asserting that my taste is worthier than millions of other people's just because it's mine. Consequently, even though I doubt I'll ever stand a chance of liking Celine Dion and her ilk, I'm still interested in deconstructing whether any such sweeping pronouncements are evidence of an unconscious classism on my part.
[info]glvalentine wrote:
Apr. 22nd, 2008 01:39 pm (UTC)
I missed adorable buttons! *falls to ground weeping*

Next time, I promise, I'll last longer than 98 minutes before fleeing and come visit you like a normal person.
[info]2muchexposition wrote:
Apr. 23rd, 2008 06:37 pm (UTC)
Awww, but I can totally still bring you pins! I'm not sure when I'll see you next (I may be visiting Chicago for the week before WisCon and missing KGB--maybe at one of Tempest's things?), but I will make every endeavor to bring some along.

I can hardly fault you for fleeing ComicCon. It seems like an entirely sensible and human urge that I surely would have indulged myself if I didn't have my professional persona behind which I could hide from all the crowds.
[info]cmpriest wrote:
Apr. 22nd, 2008 04:03 pm (UTC)
ZOMG UR UPDATIN!!!11!!
I totally did a double-take when I saw your icon ...
Welcome back!
[info]2muchexposition wrote:
Apr. 23rd, 2008 06:40 pm (UTC)
Thanks, you! Job stuff has kept me from it for awhile, but I sort of figured that if I kept my posts ultra-sort, I wouldn't have to feel too guilty about whatever author-related responsibilities I may be shirking while I wrote them.
[info]ecmyers wrote:
Apr. 22nd, 2008 05:26 pm (UTC)
You shouldn't leave your computer logged into LJ--obviously this is one of your roommates posing as you on the Internet. Fortunately he or she seems to be very convincing, and really, a facsimile of [info]2muchexposition is better than no [info]2muchexposition.
[info]2muchexposition wrote:
Apr. 23rd, 2008 06:51 pm (UTC)
But which roommate might that be?!

Actually, I'd buy your theory if it was just Monday's post, but I was actually at home when last night's went up. So perhaps we have to concede that [info]2muchexposition actually does exist.
[info]happyelfling wrote:
Apr. 22nd, 2008 05:59 pm (UTC)
Wow, those are some excellent 3 sentences there.
[info]2muchexposition wrote:
Apr. 23rd, 2008 06:55 pm (UTC)
I am totally uncertain if you are being sarcastic! Nonetheless, thank you. :)

I miss you and am very psyched to see you next month. I realize that I am in some sense perpetuating the miss-age by not paying enough attention to what you're up to SF0, but right now SF0 is thing number 37 on the list of 28 things I'm actually managing to get done. I do have an idea for a completion that might be an awesome fit for WisCon, though... maybe we could talk about that one of these days?
[info]happyelfling wrote:
Apr. 23rd, 2008 10:19 pm (UTC)
I miss you too! If you have an idea for a completion we can do at Wiscon, that sounds like a truly awesome plan, and please tell me what it is...

As for the sarcasm or lack thereof, I'll leave that for you to decide.
[info]2muchexposition wrote:
Apr. 24th, 2008 02:08 am (UTC)
Okay! Then this is just one of those lame comments that declares that I'm going to send you an e-mail, in case anyone happens to be reading this comments thread and is upset by the lack of resolution.
[info]ladyaviva wrote:
Apr. 22nd, 2008 06:15 pm (UTC)
Um...does Tor want you to keep your eventual blog entries to three sentences a day? Somehow it seems unlikely...
[info]2muchexposition wrote:
Apr. 23rd, 2008 07:03 pm (UTC)
Nah, the Tor posts will be relatively free-form. But my problem seems to center around (a) never posting in a timely fashion because (b) there's so much I want to say that I spend forever collecting bits of content and never manage to cohere them into a post. So I figured that making myself jump a few stylistic hurdles for awhile might help me break one or both of these nasty habits.
[info]alankria wrote:
Apr. 22nd, 2008 08:25 pm (UTC)
I wonder how long a 3-sentence post could get...
[info]2muchexposition wrote:
Apr. 23rd, 2008 07:03 pm (UTC)
I'm not sure, but if there were ever any kind of a contest for writing long sentences, I would totally enter it!
[info]timkelly wrote:
Apr. 22nd, 2008 10:34 pm (UTC)
Good to see you posting again! Sorry I missed you at NYCC!
[info]2muchexposition wrote:
Apr. 24th, 2008 02:04 am (UTC)
Huh. And apparently we were both at I-CON as well? I realize they were both fairly large conventions, but I feel off my game anyway.
[info]lowellboyslash wrote:
Apr. 23rd, 2008 03:02 am (UTC)
Yes, three sentences, I counted. You've hit your deadline for day one. Production is very concerned about your deadlines for days two and three and is wondering if you could possibly deliver earlier. Also, your blog called. It wants to make sure your upcoming posts don't have any continuity errors with its original series.

Edited at 2008-04-23 03:05 am (UTC)
[info]2muchexposition wrote:
Apr. 24th, 2008 02:07 am (UTC)
Drat. 2:56 isn't really earlier than 2:27, is it? Well, I'm actually planning to leave the office before midnight today, so I might yet manage to fulfill your request.

(Do I have TWO production departments? Jeez.)